At the Allianz Arena football stadium, the return match of the 1/8 Champions League final between Bayern and Liverpool will begin. The first duel of the confrontation, which took place on February 19 at Enfield, ended with an amazing 0: 0 result. Few could have imagined that two such attacking teams as the German champion and finalist of the Champions League "roll out" zeros.
The draw surprised by the fact that it was completely knocked out of the logical series of the results of Bayern in the matches that preceded the fight against Liverpool. From January 27 to February 15, Bayern played five meetings in which won four times with one defeat, in all these matches, the bet "both teams to score - yes." In the group stage of the current Champions League this season, Bayern played three matches in which they won twice with one draw. Munich tied with Ajax (1: 1), defeated Benfica (5: 1), were stronger than AEK (2: 0). Also note that in the second part of the season, Bayern looks better than in the fall.
Klopp is torn between the desire to repeat the success of last season and get to the championship final and maintaining leadership in the Premier League. In late January - early February, the Merseysiders stumbled twice, tied with Lester and West Ham with the same score (1: 1). This led to the fact that Manchester City on points overtook Liverpool in the standings, however, Liverpool had a game in the reserve. There are doubts about the fact that Klopp's squad will have enough safety factor, playing on two fronts. You should also pay attention to Liverpool's away stats in the Champions League group stage, the “Reds” lost three matches out of three, including the Crvena Zvezda .
Bayern added a bit in the second part of the season, Munich used to play on two fronts, unlike Liverpool, for which the current season is special. Klopp will have to make a choice, otherwise, he can lose everywhere. And it’s not at all a fact that the German will choose the Champions League, not the Premier League.
"Victory of Bayern", with a coefficient of 2.06